后屯路32号院:紧急：英语短文“socioeconomic”

socioeconomic

German Marx had studied England's market economy, finally obtained one to want the socialist society substitution capitalist society the conclusion, therefore afterwards had one to practice the Marx planned economy Soviet Union. Afterwards, moreover a mother tongue also was German Austrian breathes out Ye Ke to study Soviet Union's planned economy, finally obtained one to want the liberalism substitution socialism the conclusion. Now China is arguing him. These two person's work, I do not have the original story to read off completely. Even if is reads off, also did not have the original story to comment the height length. But discovered these two thinkers from research economy obtaining, all as if by prior agreement sum up to the sociological conclusion come up. The original two people all have a common sociological starting point, is humanitarianism. Marx said must break the capitalism shackles, breathes out Ye Ke to say does not want the socialism to enslave.
The planned economy by the history had been proven now was defeated. But cannot say Marx saw in the past the capitalist society system succeeded. The Marxism launch labor movement, as well as afterwards Soviet Union revolutionized the success, has posed a huge life and death threat for the tradition capitalism, the rich man and the politician is afraid the revolution to erupt, is compelled to carry on the social system reform. Therefore the modern capitalism social system compared the Marx time to be civilized. But this is not the market economy success, but is by the socialist revolution pressure impetus, is the socialism thought success. The modern capitalism society's has already contained many socialism factor. Europe is practicing the market economy + socialism. On the contrary China, is in turn must do the socialism + market economy. The reform beginning is dissimilar, faced with the question is different, but the goal should be same. Also has you if saw US, a manpower social security card, guaranteed the unemployment also has the food to eat, very difficult to say this thing belongs to the capitalism, explains continually the American like this self-praise non-monopoly capitalism country, also is not neglects the weak trend community completely the benefit.
In any event, the economic is cannot leave the sociology. Lays undue stress on the economical development efficiency rule, but does not speak the social justice, is violates the humanitarianism rationally. Regardless of is Marx or the Kazak Ye gram, all did not hope saw the humanity lives in one is not equal, society which enslaves. The Adams secret-ink writing "National wealth Has discussed", after acknowledged selfish is the work power, also writes "Moral Sentiment To discuss", elaborates the humanity to help other people sympathy. As an economist, he has not lost humanity's conscience, still obviously it to fair society's expectation. Certainly only emphasized the social justice, does not speak the production public wealth the efficiency, also is not right, also is cannot accomplish. In the past for has divided the landlord landlord family's land and the property, the social unfair question has solved temporarily, but has not solved the entire public wealth growth problem, appeared the new society very quickly unfair. Only speaks the sociology, does not speak the economic, the history had proven also is not good.
If economic and sociological row of order, then the sociology is a starting point, also is the terminal node. Under a fair social system, establishes a person person to work according to ability, distribution according to work market economy mechanism, this is we hopes the economic solution the question. If loses this social justice premise, that causes everybody to work according to ability, according to “energy” assignment. This “energy”, refers to the work, but refers to the special policy, special relations, authority, even violence and so on. Acknowledged this economical development way the economic, what type economic is? Is enslaves other people the economic, is the wild animal economic.
China's village question, also is not the pure social question, also is not the pure economic problem, but is the social economy question. Everybody place, the regard social security, alleviates the village society question, but has sacrificed the scale agriculture economic efficiency, this is not right. This is only speaks the socialism not to speak the market economy, will only be able to cause the future more society question. Moreover the question is more and more serious. The city industry speaks the so-called labor market free competition, uses the village person's labor force brutally, does not give the village person equality the status, even dared not to give “the peasant laborer” the blood and sweat wages, on the surface reduced the urban economy cost, but has sacrificed the village person's equal rights. This is only speaks the market economy not to speak the socialism, also only can cause the more social question. Pondered the economic question, finally always must sum up to the sociological question comes up, wants to hide cannot shunt. Is looked advocates the everybody equality free sociology, everybody not equal free sociology. This also is weighs the economist and the economic policy decision maker's human conscience ruler.

不知道这能不能对你有帮助，祝你好运！