机器猫摆件蛋糕:帮着翻译下.谢谢了啊! 急用

来源:百度文库 编辑:查人人中国名人网 时间:2024/04/30 11:31:24
Jitter Reduction
In all of the above techniques where the output is a digital signal transitioning at the desired rate, one can reduce the jitter by dividing the signal down. The jitter time will be less as a function of the resulting period of the signal. For example, if you want a 1.536MHz signal, and you have a 16.384MHz clock, you could synthesize a 6.144MHz signal to an arbitrary resolution, and then divide it by four. The resulting signal would have a jitter of 2.3%. This is an acceptable jitter for any data communications related application, such as T1 Frame Relay Customer Service Unit/Data Service Unit (CSU/DSU). As mentioned before, using a phase locked loop also
reduces the unwanted jitter, where the filtering of the loop is used to attenuate the unwanted side band energy which is the cause of the jitter. One of the simplest means of implementing this, is to use a voltage controlled crystal oscillator whose output is exclusive OR.d with the output of the synthesizer and whose input is the RC filtered XOR output.

Using an FPGA
Even the seemingly complex DDFS is simpler to implement in an FPGA than fractional synthesis because the DDFS circuit consists of replicated units, all interconnected simply. You don.t need to find a fractional solution, and realize the state machines and modulo counters. In fact, the DDFS is the most versatile as it may be changed at any time by placing a new N at the adder. Calculating the N may get a bit difficult past 32 bits, because computer math programs are often unable to deal with the resolution and display of hexadecimal or binary numbers beyond this point. I use MathCad TM from MathSoft,Inc. and split the calculation up into two parts to get arbitrary resolution.
The cost of implementation is the adder and the D-type flipflop for every bit of synthesis. If examined in this fashion, the cost of a DDFS is more than the other methods. In large FPGAs, the philosophy might be best stated as .gates are free.as long as the design fits into the intended part. It takes 26 CLBs to make a 48 bit DDFS in the XC4000 family. Even for the smallest part, this is about a quarter of the total CLB count (XC4003). For larger parts, such as the XC4085XL, it is hardly a consideration.

Conclusion
The advantages of using FPGAs for frequency synthesis are many: no dependence on voltage, temperature, or aging; and no external analog components

跳动减少
在所有的输出是数传信号以被需要的比率转变的上述技术都中,一藉由分开信号下能减少跳动。 跳动时间将会比较少如信号的产生时期的一个功能。 举例来说,如果你想要 1.536MHz 信号,而且你有 16.384Mhz clock,你可以综合对一个 arbitrary 决议的 6.144MHz 信号, 然后四点之前分开它。 产生的信号会有一个 2.3% 的跳动。这是任何的数据沟通相关的申请一个可接受的跳动,例如 继电器客户维修的 T1 体格单位/数据维修单位.(CSU/DSU) 当做提到以前, 使用被锁环也的时期
减少不必要的跳动,在环的过滤用来变薄不必要的边乐团是跳动的因素能源的地方。 实现这的最简单的方法之一, 要使用一个电压受约束的水晶振动者谁的输出是有合成器的输出独家的 OR.d 和谁的输入是被过滤 XOR 输出的 RC。

使用 FPGA
甚至那表面上复杂的 DDFS 是简单在 FPGA 中实现的胜於微少的综合因为 DDFS 线路由~所组成折叠的单位,全部只是互相连接。 你 don.t 需要找微少的解决, 而且了解州机器和 modulo 柜台。 事实上,当它随时藉由在欧洲产的小毒蛇放置新的 N 可能被改变, DDFS 是最多才多艺的。 因为计算机数学计画是时常不能处理 十六进位或二进位的数字决议和炫耀超过点的 , 所以计算 N 可能拿困难的过去 32 一点点给一一点点。我进入二个部份之内向上使用来自 MathSoft ,公司和劈开计算的 MathCad TM 得到 arbitrary 决议。
落实的费用是每一点点的综合欧洲产的小毒蛇和 D- 类型 flipflop 。 如果在这种流行中调查,DDFS 的费用不只是另一个方法。 在大的 FPGAs 中,哲学可能最好决定了的同样地 . 门是 free.as 长的当设计进入有意的部份之内适合。 它带 26 CLBs 在 XC4000 家庭中制造一 48 一点点 DDFS 。 甚至为最小的部份,这是大约总 CLB 计数的四分之一。 (XC4003) 对於比较大的部份,例如 XC4085XL ,它刚刚是考虑。

结论
使用 FPGAs 作为频率综合的利益是多数: 没有依赖电压,温度或老化; 和没有外部类比成份