汤普森单节37分整场:求帮忙翻译一下

来源:百度文库 编辑:查人人中国名人网 时间:2024/04/28 14:49:06
The second factor is the informality5 that is widely cited as characterising people
management in small firms (Wilkinson, 1999; Harris, 2000, 2002; Matlay, 2002; Jones,
2003a). Again, such processes are not unique to small organisations, and as Ram et al.
(2001) point out, many small firms exhibit high degrees of formality in some areas of
employment. That said, management through informal methods is seen by many
owner-managers both as appropriate to the close working relationships in small firms
and as conducive to the development of trust (Wilkinson, 1999) as well as a source of
flexibility and competitive advantage (Vinten et al., 1997). Formal employment policies,
including EO policies, may be perceived by SME owner-managers as inhibiting
flexibility and undermining informal relations. Nor may they be perceived to be (or
actually be) the most effective and cost effective way to solve pressing business
problems, as illustrated by Marchington et al.’s (2003) study of the sophisticated use
of informal recruitment methods to address skills shortages in the haulage industry.
On the other hand, lack of formality in recruitment and selection may reflect a lack of
exposure to, and awareness of, such practices arising from a lack of regular engagement
with skilled labour markets. This in turn may lead to a reliance on informal ‘word of
mouth’ approaches (Carroll et al., 1999), which are likely to be EO unfriendly.
A third factor is that many small businesses operate in tight product markets with
numerous competitive pressures (Holliday, 1995; Bacon et al., 1996; Jones, 2003a).
Sophisticated EO polices require an investment and may create opportunity costs
(Curran et al., 1997). These costs may be more readily apparent than the benefits, and
are proportionally greater in small firms (Dex and Scheibl, 1999; Harris, 2000, 2002).
Fourth, the notion of ‘family firm’ (taken literally or metaphorically) may encourage
homogeneity rather than diversity (Holliday, 1995). As Holliday observes, it can be
antithetical to equality of opportunity in relation to gender, importing, to the detriment
of women, patriarchal power relationships, paternalism (benevolent or otherwise) and
sex-role spillover from the home. Moreover, many owner-managers are men6 and we
contend that this is likely to have an impact on the propensity to pursue EO for
women.

第二个因素是informality5,人们普遍认为是characterising小企业管理(威尔金森,1999年; 哈里斯,2000年,2002年; Matlay,2002年; Jones,2003a). 再次,这种过程并非小团体,谁是羊Al. (2001)指出,许多小公司的形式在某些程度上表现出很高的就业领域. 虽然如此,管理通过非正式方式被不少创业既适合了密切的合作关系,小企业和有利于发展信托(威尔金森,1999年),以及令人灵活性和竞争优势(Vinten网站Al. 1997年). 正规就业政策,包括雇佣条例政策,可视为中小企业创业的非正式关系,阻碍和破坏弹性. 不得被视为(或实际)成本效益和最有效的方法来解决企业紧迫问题,如AlMarchington网站. 's(2003)的研究,采用先进技术短缺非正式招聘的方法来解决运输业. 另一方面,在缺乏正式招聘选拔可能反映缺少接触、了解,这种做法引起了不经常接触熟练的劳动力市场. 这反过来又可能导致依赖非正式的口耳相传的方式(Al卡莱尔网站. ,1999),可能是EO不友好. 第三个因素是,许多小企业经营有许多产品市场竞争压力紧张(巴耶夫,1995年; 培根Al品牌. 1996年; Jones,2003a). EO尖端投资政策规定,可创造机会成本(AlMurray品牌. 1997年). 这些费用可能比较显而易见的好处,小公司有更大的比例(DexScheibl,1999; 哈里斯,2000年,2002年). 四、概念的家族企业」(字面上或比喻)可能会鼓励性而非多样性(巴耶夫,1995年). 为纪念拜,可以挂在机会平等与性别、进口、不利于妇女,父权关系,往往(或仁)和性别角色溢出赶出家门. 此外,很多车主men6管理员,我们认为这可能会影响妇女EO倾向于追求.

第二个因素是广泛被援引作为描绘人管理在小公司的informality5 (Wilkinson 1999 年中; 哈里斯2000 年2002 年; Matlay 2002 年; 琼斯, 2003.a) 。再, 这样过程不是独特的对小组织, 和作为Ram 等。(2001) 指出, 许多小公司展览高度形式在就业一些区域。那说, 管理通过不拘形式的方法由许多所有者经理象适当象有助于看见对接近的工作关系在小公司中和信任(Wilkinson 1999 的) 发展并且源泉的灵活性和竞争优势(Vinten 等1997) 。正式就业政策, 包括EO 政策, 也许由SME 所有者经理察觉作为禁止的灵活性和破坏不拘形式的联系。亦不依照由对不拘形式的补充方法的老练用途的Marchington 等(2003) 研究说明愿他们被察觉是(或实际上是) 最有效和最有效的方式解决按业务问题, 演讲技能短缺在货车使用费产业。另一方面, 缺乏形式在补充和选择也许反射缺乏曝光对, 和了悟, 这样实践出现从缺乏规则订婚以熟练劳动市场。这也许反过来导致对不拘形式的` 口述的消息的信赖' 接近(Carroll 等, 1999), 是可能的是EO 不友好。第三个因素是, 许多小企业经营在紧的产品市场上以许多竞争压力(Holliday 1995 年; Bacon 等1996 年; 琼斯, 2003.a) 。老练EO 维持治安要求投资, 也许创造机会成本(Curran 等1997) 。这些费用比好处也许欣然明显的, 和是成比例伟大的在小公司中(Dex 和Scheibl 1999 年; 哈里斯2000 年, 2002) 。第四, ` 家庭企业的概念' (逐字地或隐喻地被采取) 也许鼓励同质性而不是变化(Holliday, 1995) 。当Holliday 观察, 它可能是相反的对机会均等关于性别, 进口, 妇女的损伤, 家长式力量关系、家长作风(仁慈或否则) 并且性角色溢出从家。而且, 许多所有者经理是men6 并且我们主张这可能有对倾向的冲击追求EO 为妇女。