振动棒价格:高手帮忙翻译一下！谢谢

China is a civil law countries, the sources of law in China, as the main source of law to statutory law, does not recognize the system of jurisprudence. However statutory limitations led to the emergence of a large number of legal interpretation, but the interpretation of laws alone can not solve the inherent error of law. Throughout our history, the case has legal sources. Code and jurisprudence, as the representative of Western Liangdafaxi characteristics of the world economy in recent years with the expansion of exchanges and increasingly integration. All through the length of their respective comparative law and jurisprudence, both made on the basis of the need for integration, and whether our current system of jurisprudence and the jurisprudence of the process should be of concern to a few brief questions about my own views.

China is the mainland legal system country, in the present law origin, take the written law as the main law origin, does not acknowledge the legal precedent system. However the written law limitation causes the massive legal explanation the appearance, but only depends on the legal explanation is cannot solve the written law inherent flaw. Looked over our country history, the legal precedent also once was the legal origin. The statute book and the legal precedent, take the western two big legal systems the representative characteristic, in recent years but day by day fused along with the world economics contact expansion. This article through the comparison written law and the legal precedent respective length, proposed in this foundation two fusions necessities, and on our country present stage whether briefly introduced several questions which the legal precedent as well as in the introduction legal precedent system process should pay attention to discuss own view.

China is the mainland legal system country, in the present law origin, take the written law as the main law origin, does not acknowledge the legal precedent system. However the written law limitation causes the massive legal explanation the appearance, but only depends on the legal explanation is cannot solve the written law inherent flaw. Looked over our country history, the legal precedent also once was the legal origin. The statute book and the legal precedent, take the western two big legal systems the representative characteristic, in recent years but day by day fused along with the world economics contact expansion. This article through the comparison written law and the legal precedent respective length, proposed in this foundation two fusions necessities, and on our country present stage whether briefly introduced several questions which the legal precedent as well as in the introduction legal precedent system process should pay attention to discuss own view.

China is a civil law countries, the sources of law in China, as the main source of law to statutory law, does not recognize the system of jurisprudence. However statutory limitations led to the emergence of a large number of legal interpretation, but the interpretation of laws alone can not solve the inherent error of law. Throughout our history, the case has legal sources. Code and jurisprudence, as the representative of Western Liangdafaxi characteristics of the world economy in recent years with the expansion of exchanges and increasingly integration. All through the length of their respective comparative law and jurisprudence, both made on the basis of the need for integration, and whether our current system of jurisprudence and the jurisprudence of the process should be of concern to a few brief questions about my own views.

China is a civil law countries, the sources of law in China, as the main source of law to statutory law, does not recognize the system of jurisprudence. However statutory limitations led to the emergence of a large number of legal interpretation, but the interpretation of laws alone can not solve the inherent error of law. Throughout our history, the case has legal sources. Code and jurisprudence, as the representative of Western Liangdafaxi characteristics of the world economy in recent years with the expansion of exchanges and increasingly integration. All through the length of their respective comparative law and jurisprudence, both made on the basis of the need for integration, and whether our current system of jurisprudence and the jurisprudence of the process should be of concern to a few brief questions about my own views.
看看能不能用啊？

China is the mainland legal system country, in the present law origin, take the written law as the main law origin, does not acknowledge the legal precedent system. However the written law limitation causes the massive legal explanation the appearance, but only depends on the legal explanation is cannot solve the written law inherent flaw. Looked over our country history, the legal precedent also once was the legal origin. The statute book and the legal precedent, take the western two big legal systems the representative characteristic, in recent years but day by day fused along with the world economics contact expansion. This article through the comparison written law and the legal precedent respective length, proposed in this foundation two fusions necessities, and on our country present stage whether briefly introduced several questions which the legal precedent as well as in the introduction legal precedent system process should pay attention to discuss own view.